Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Shiner Moseley and Associates, Inc. and Hdr Engineering, Inc. v. W.O.H. Enterprises, L.L.C.

Shiner Moseley and Associates, Inc. and Hdr Engineering, Inc. v. W.O.H. Enterprises, L.L.C.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 13, 2010

Shiner Moseley and Associates, Inc. and Hdr Engineering, Inc. v. W.O.H. Enterprises, L.L.C.

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-09-00697-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

SHINER MOSELEY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

AND HDR ENGINEERING, INC.,                                                Appellants,

 

                                                             v.

 

W.O.H. ENTERPRISES, L.L.C.,                                                    Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

 

                     On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

                                       of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

      Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellants, Shiner Moseley and Associates, Inc. and HDR Engineering, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 08-62284-3.  Appellants have filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences.  Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal with prejudice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ agreed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

13th day of May, 2010.

 

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.