Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Airgas, Inc. and Neil Prescott v. Manuel and Lydia Elizondo

Airgas, Inc. and Neil Prescott v. Manuel and Lydia Elizondo
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 6, 2010

Airgas, Inc. and Neil Prescott v. Manuel and Lydia Elizondo

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-08-00158-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

AIRGAS, INC. AND NEIL PRESCOTT,                                     Appellants,

 

                                                             v.

 

MANUEL AND LYDIA ELIZONDO,                                             Appellees.

____________________________________________________________

 

                     On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

                                       of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

                    Before Justices Yañez , Rodriguez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellants perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 1 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 07-62262-1.  Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the underlying issues were resolved by agreement.  Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellants. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

6th day of May, 2010.

 

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.