in Re: Randolfo Castillo, M.D.
in Re: Randolfo Castillo, M.D.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-10-00046-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE: RANDOLFO CASTILLO, M.D.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Vela Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1 Relator, Randolfo Castillo, M.D., filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief in the above cause on February 4, 2010. That same day, the Court requested that the real parties in interest, State Farm Lloyds, David Hasley, Danny D. Christensen, and Ronald Rudolfo Castillo, file responses to: (1) relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, and (2) relator’s emergency motion for temporary relief.
Such responses have been duly filed.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus
See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but is not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). and the response thereto, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief are DENIED. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 8th day of March, 2010.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.