Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Ray Fox v. Somerset Apartments

Ray Fox v. Somerset Apartments
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 23, 2010

Ray Fox v. Somerset Apartments

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-10-00328-CV

RAY FOX APPELLANT V. SOMERSET APARTMENTS APPELLEE

------------ FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------ On November 12, 2010, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk=s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2).

We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk=s record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk=s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: December 23, 2010

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.