Ray Guerra v. State
Ray Guerra v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-10-00410-CR
Ray Guerra | | APPELLANT |
V. | ||
The State of Texas | | STATE |
----------
FROM THE 30th District Court OF Wichita COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
----------
Appellant Ray Guerra attempts to appeal his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, imposed following a bench trial on July 30, 2010. Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2(a), a notice of appeal was due on August 30, 2010. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). Appellant, however, filed his notice of appeal on September 28, 2010. In addition, the trial court’s certification of defendant’s right to appeal states that Appellant has waived his right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
On September 29, 2010, we sent Appellant’s attorney a letter advising that we were concerned that we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal, and further advising that unless Appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by October 11, 2010, we would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. To date, we have received no response.
A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of rule 26 is essential to vest this court with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). The court of criminal appeals has expressly held that, without a timely filed notice of appeal or motion for extension of time, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over an appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210.
Because the notice of appeal in this case was untimely, we have no jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: December 16, 2010
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.