in Re Michael Robert VanWinkle
in Re Michael Robert VanWinkle
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-10-00332-CV
In re Michael Robert VanWinkle | | RELATOR |
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
------------
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. [2] Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, GARDNER, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: November 29, 2010
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4., 52.8(d).
[2]We make no determination regarding the trial court’s failure to rule on Relator’s “Declaration of Conflict Between Attorney and Client and Motion for Substitution of Appointed Counsel” because Relator has not specifically sought relief as to that motion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.