Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Harold Higgins and Lonnie Higgins v. Matagorda County and Van Vleck Independent School District

Harold Higgins and Lonnie Higgins v. Matagorda County and Van Vleck Independent School District
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 11, 2010

Harold Higgins and Lonnie Higgins v. Matagorda County and Van Vleck Independent School District

Opinion











NUMBER 13-09-00431-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

HAROLD HIGGINS AND LONNIE HIGGINS, APPELLANTS,



v.



MATAGORDA COUNTY AND VAN VLECK

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., APPELLEES.

____________________________________________________________



On Appeal from the 130th District Court

of Matagorda County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellants' brief in the above cause was due on December 4, 2009. (1) On January 5, 2010, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellants' failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellants. Appellee DOH Oil Company has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain the failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file a brief, or file a brief. Accordingly, appellee DOH Oil Company's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).



PER CURIAM



Delivered and filed the 11th

day of February, 2010.









1. 1 The brief was originally due on August 24, 2009. This Court subsequently granted appellants three extensions of time to file the brief, extending the due date until December 4, 2009.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.