Harold Higgins and Lonnie Higgins v. Matagorda County and Van Vleck Independent School District
Harold Higgins and Lonnie Higgins v. Matagorda County and Van Vleck Independent School District
Opinion
______________________________________________________________
HAROLD HIGGINS AND LONNIE HIGGINS, APPELLANTS,
MATAGORDA COUNTY AND VAN VLECK
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., APPELLEES.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The appellants' brief in the above cause was due on December 4, 2009. (1) On January 5, 2010, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellants' failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellants. Appellee DOH Oil Company has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain the failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file a brief, or file a brief. Accordingly, appellee DOH Oil Company's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 11th
day of February, 2010.
1. 1 The brief was originally due on August 24, 2009. This Court subsequently granted appellants three extensions of time to file the brief, extending the due date until December 4, 2009.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.