COURT OF APPEALS

                                                 SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                FORT WORTH

                                                 NO. 2-10-141-CV

WENDY JO ARCHER                                                                         APPELLANT

                                                             V.

CHRISTOPHER JOHN ARCHER                                                          APPELLEE

                                                       ------------

              FROM THE 325TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                                       ------------

                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION^[1]

                                                       ------------

Appellant Wendy Jo Archer attempts to appeal from denial of her motion to recuse the trial judge in cause number 325-371563-04.  Judge Jeff Walker heard appellant=s motion and denied it on April 16, 2010.  Appellant filed a notice of appeal, and on May 12, 2010, we notified the parties of our concern that this court lacked jurisdiction over this appeal because the AOrder Denying Motion to Recuse@ does not appear to be a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order.  We also stated that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court, on or before May 24, 2010, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  No response has been filed.

Generally, an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment or order.  Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).  An order denying a motion to recuse is an unappealable interlocutory order.  Hawkins v. Walker, 233 S.W.3d 380, 401 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 2007, pet. denied). Specifically, rule 18a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure provides that an order denying a motion to recuse may be reviewed only Aon appeal from the final judgment.@  Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(f); see Hawkins, 233 S.W.3d at 401.  Because the order from which appellant attempts to appeal is an unappealable interlocutory order, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  July 1, 2010