Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

SFTF Holdings, LLC v. Primelending, a Plainscapital Company, Mortgage...

SFTF Holdings, LLC v. Primelending, a Plainscapital Company, Mortgage...
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 1, 2010

SFTF Holdings, LLC v. Primelending, a Plainscapital Company, Mortgage...

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                COURT OF APPEALS

                                                 SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                FORT WORTH

 

 

                                                 NO. 2-10-153-CV

 

 

SFTF HOLDINGS, LLC                                                                       APPELLANT

 

                                                             V.

 

PRIMELENDING, A PLAINSCAPITAL                                                 APPELLEES

COMPANY, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.,

AS NOMINEE FOR LENDER AND

LENDERS SUCCESSORS AND

ASSIGNS, AND ONEWEST BANK,

FSB, AS DULY AUTHORIZED

MORTGAGE SERVICER FOR WELLS

FARGO BANK, NA AS TRUSTEE

OF THE LEHMAN MORTGAGE

TRUST 2007-1 TRUST FUND

 

                                                       ------------

 

               FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

 

                                                       ------------

 

                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

 

                                                       ------------

 


Appellant SFTF Holdings, LLC attempts to appeal from the trial court=s AOrder Granting Summary Judgment@ signed May 14, 2010, in favor of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Onewest Bank, FSB.

On May 17, 2010, this court sent a letter to SFTF Holdings stating that we were concerned that we might not have jurisdiction because the order did not appear to dispose of all parties in the case.  We stated that unless SFTF Holdings or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, this appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  No response was filed.

Because there is no final judgment or appealable order, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

 

 

PER CURIAM

 

PANEL:  WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  July 1, 2010



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.