Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Reginald Tidwell v. Xerxes Cama

Reginald Tidwell v. Xerxes Cama
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 27, 2010

Reginald Tidwell v. Xerxes Cama

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                COURT OF APPEALS

                                                 SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                FORT WORTH

 

                                                 NO. 2-10-034-CV

REGINALD TIDWELL                                                                         APPELLANT

 

                                                             V.

 

XERXES CAMA                                                                                    APPELLEE

 

                                                        ----------

              FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY

                                                        ----------

                    MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                                        ----------

On May 7, 2010, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief and the need for an extension.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.  We have not received any response.

Because appellant=s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).


 

PER CURIAM                

 

 

PANEL:  DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

 

DELIVERED:  May 27, 2010

 



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.