Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Reginald Tidwell v. Xerxes Cama

Reginald Tidwell v. Xerxes Cama
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 27, 2010

Reginald Tidwell v. Xerxes Cama

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-10-034-CV REGINALD TIDWELL APPELLANT V. XERXES CAMA APPELLEE ---------- FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ---------- On May 7, 2010, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief and the need for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. response.

Because appellant=s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 27, 2010

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.