Jim Shaw-Surety v. State
Jim Shaw-Surety v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-10-036-CV
JIM SHAW, DEFENDANT-SURETY APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE
------------
FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
------------
In this bond forfeiture case, Appellant Jim Shaw attempts to appeal from the trial court=s judgment signed October 16, 2009.[2] Because Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial, his notice of appeal was due January 14, 2010, but he did not file his notice of appeal until February 3, 2010, which was untimely.[3]
On February 10, 2010, we notified Appellant that his appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction unless, by February 22, 2010, he filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.[4] No response has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.[5]
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: March 18, 2010
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
[2]See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. arts. 44.42, 44.44 (Vernon 2006) (providing that bond forfeitures are appealable according to the appellate rules governing civil appeals).
[3]See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1).
[4]See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
[5]See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.