Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

in Re Billy Joe Scales

in Re Billy Joe Scales
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 15, 2010

in Re Billy Joe Scales

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                        COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

                                                 NO. 2-10-071-CV

 

IN RE BILLY JOE SCALES                                                                    RELATOR

 

                                                       ------------

                                           ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

                                                       ------------

                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

                                                       ------------

The court has considered relator=s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.[2]  Accordingly, relator=s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

 


PER CURIAM

 

 

PANEL:  GARDNER and MEIER, JJ.

 

DELIVERED:  March 15, 2010



     [1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

     [2]This court has been informed by the district clerk=s office and by the trial court clerk for Criminal District Court No. 1 that they have not received the motion for DNA testing that relator contends he filed.  Presentment of the motion to the trial court is a prerequisite to mandamus relief.  See O=Connor v. First Court of Appeals, 837 S.W.2d 94, 97 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding) (AMandamus will issue when there is a legal duty to perform a non‑discretionary act, a demand for performance, and a refusal.@); In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.CAmarillo 2001, orig. proceeding) (AIndeed, one can hardly be faulted for doing nothing if he were never aware of the need to act.@).  Because relator=s motion has never been received by the district clerk=s office for filing, the Respondent has not been provided an opportunity to rule upon the motion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.