Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Rogelio Salinas v. Hasslocher Enterprises, Inc.

Rogelio Salinas v. Hasslocher Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 9, 2010

Rogelio Salinas v. Hasslocher Enterprises, Inc.

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00073-CV Rogelio SALINAS, Appellant v. HASSLOCHER ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 35601 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: June 9, 2010 DISMISSED Rogelio Salinas’s appellant’s brief was due April 22, 2010. The clerk of this court notified Salinas’s attorney of the due date by letter dated March 23, 2010. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed. Accordingly, on May 5, 2010, the court ordered Salinas to file, not later than May 17, 2010, his appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to 04-10-00073-CV timely file the brief. We advised Salinas that if he failed to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX . R. APP . P. 38.8(a).

Salinas did not file a timely response to tour May 5 order. Instead, Salinas filed a response on May 21, 2010, stating he did not receive the May 5 order until May 20; and stating that appellant’s brief would be filed “on or before May 25, 2010.” The brief has not been filed.

We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.