COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-287-CR

MANUEL RIVAS SIMENTAL APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 ------------ Appellant Manuel Rivas Simental entered an open plea of guilty to driving while intoxicated-felony repetition. The trial court sentenced him to two years’ confinement.

Simental’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet

 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. the requirements of Anders v. California 2 by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. Simental was given the opportunity to file a pro se brief, but he did not do so. As the reviewing court, we must conduct an independent evaluation of the record to determine whether counsel is correct in determining that the appeal is frivolous. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W .2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W .2d 920, 923 (Tex. App.—Fort W orth 1995, no pet.). Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988). Because Simental entered an open plea of guilty, our independent review for potential error is limited to potential jurisdictional defects, the voluntariness of Simental’s plea, error that is not independent of and supports the judgment of guilt, and error occurring after entry of the guilty plea. See Monreal v. State, 99 S.W .3d 615, 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Young v. State, 8 S.W .3d 656, 666–67 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).

W e have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. W e agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. W e find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W .3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); accord Meza v. State, 206 S.W .3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). W e therefore grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

SUE W ALKER JUSTICE PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and W ALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: March 4, 2010