Martin Barnes, Maxie Gable, and George Persley v. BNSF Railway Company
Martin Barnes, Maxie Gable, and George Persley v. BNSF Railway Company
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-329-CV
MARTIN BARNES, MAXIE GABLE, APPELLANTS
AND GEORGE PERSLEY
V.
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
----------
We have considered “Appellants’ Amended Motion To Dismiss.” Although appellee BNSF Railway Company opposes appellants’ motion, appellee has not filed a notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(c). Accordingly, it is the court’s opinion that “Appellants’ Amended Motion To Dismiss” should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: February 25, 2010
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.