Dany Joe Guest, Marry E. Tindle, and Cynthia E. Martin v. TXU Electric Delivery Company
Dany Joe Guest, Marry E. Tindle, and Cynthia E. Martin v. TXU Electric Delivery Company
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-385-CV
DANY JOE GUEST, MARRY E. TINDLE, APPELLANTS
AND CYNTHIA E. MARTIN
V.
TXU ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY APPELLEE
----------
FROM PROBATE COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
----------
On December 29, 2009, we notified appellants that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk=s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk=s record and provided this court with proof of payment.
Because appellants have not made payment arrangements for the clerk=s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).
Appellants shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOT, JJ.
DELIVERED: January 28, 2010
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.