Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

CMR Energy, L.P. v. Martin Guarjardo

CMR Energy, L.P. v. Martin Guarjardo
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 17, 2010

CMR Energy, L.P. v. Martin Guarjardo

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-09-00723-CV CMR ENERGY, L.P., Appellant v. Martin GUAJARDO and Celia Guajardo, Appellees From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas Trial Court No. 06-06-21768-MCV Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: March 17, 2010 JOINT MOTION TO REVERSE AND REMAND GRANTED; REVERSED AND REMANDED The parties have filed a joint motion stating they have fully resolved and settled all issues in dispute. The parties ask that we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for entry of a take nothing judgment in accordance with the settlement agreement. See TEX .

R. APP . P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). The parties have also asked that we release and discharge CMR Energy, L.P., as principal, and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, as surety, from the 04-09-00723-CV

supersedeas bond filed to suspend execution of judgment. The parties have agreed that each party will bear its own costs.

We grant the motion. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for entry of a take nothing judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. The supersedeas bond filed by CMR Energy, L.P., as principal, and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, as surety, is released and all obligations thereon are discharged.

Costs of the appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them. And, the clerk of this court, as requested by the parties, is ordered to issue the mandate contemporaneously with this opinion.

PER CURIAM

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.