NNN Met Center 10-1, LLC NNN Met Center 10-2, LLC NNN Met Center 10-3, LLC NNN...
NNN Met Center 10-1, LLC NNN Met Center 10-2, LLC NNN Met Center 10-3, LLC NNN...
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-11-00029-CV
NNN Met Center 10-1, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-2, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-3, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-4, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-5, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-6, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-7, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-8, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-9, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-10, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-11, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-13, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-14, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-15, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-16, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-17, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-18, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-19, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-20, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-21, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-22, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-23, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-24, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-25, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-26, LLC; NNN Met Center 10-27, LLC; and NNN Met Center 10-28, LLC, Appellants v. BACM 2005-3 Met Center Office, LLC; Mark L. Patterson; Jeffrey J. Zissa; R. Terry Miller; E. Joe Berger, III; John A. Bain; Michael C. Elrod; Beverly A. Houston; Juanita Strickland; Janie Mucha; LNR Partners, LLC; and Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc., Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-10-004498, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
We previously abated this appeal because, as a result of NNN Met Center 10-25’s filing for bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, this suit has been automatically stayed.1 See Tex. R. App. P. 8. Appellants have filed
See 11 U.S.C. § 362. an unopposed motion to extend abatement, informing us that the automatic stay has been extended until February 28, 2012. We grant appellants’ motion.
Any party may file a motion to reinstate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the bankruptcy court. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. It is the parties’ responsibility to notify the Court as soon as possible if an event occurs that would allow reinstatement. Id. Failure to notify this Court of a lift of the automatic stay or the conclusion of the bankruptcy proceeding may result in dismissal of the case for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
__________________________________________ Bob Pemberton, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose Bankruptcy Filed: November 17, 2011
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.