Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Tahereh Rokhti, Minaz Chamadia,...

Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Tahereh Rokhti, Minaz Chamadia,...
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 19, 2011

Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Tahereh Rokhti, Minaz Chamadia,...

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN






NO. 03-11-00057-CV


Appellants, Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Tahereh Rokhti, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi // Cross Appellants, Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation; William H. Kuntz, Jr., in his official capacity, et. al.



v.



Appellees, Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation; William H. Kuntz, Jr., in his official capacity, et al. // Cross Appellees, Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Tahereh Rokhti, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi






FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-09-004118, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA-DOYAL, JUDGE PRESIDING


O R D E R


PER CURIAM

The parties have filed a joint motion to permit the parties to access sealed records. The clerk's record includes five documents sealed by the trial court and transmitted to this Court under seal. The trial court sealed the documents because they include specific contents of the State's written examination for facialist specialty licensure. Under the terms of the trial court's sealing order, the parties' counsel may view the sealed documents either directly or through another "qualified person." We grant the parties' joint motion. The parties' counsel or another "qualified person," as that term is defined in the trial court's sealing order, are permitted access to the sealed documents.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Goodwin

Filed: July 19, 2011

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.