Jose Arturo Oliva-Ortiz v. State
Jose Arturo Oliva-Ortiz v. State
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 19, 2011.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-11-00325-CR
____________
JOSE ARTURO OLIVA-ORTIZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 338th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1288480
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant entered a guilty plea to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on March 18, 2011, to confinement for two years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
Because appellant’s plea was made pursuant to a plea bargain, he may appeal only matters raised by a written pre-trial motion or with the trial court’s permission. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record does not contain any pre-trial rulings or grant of permission to appeal.[1] Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Seymore and Boyce.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
[1] The trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal does not reflect whether the defendant has the right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). We need not have the certification corrected, however, because the record demonstrates that the defendant has no right of appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Greenwell v. Court of Appeals for Thirteenth Judicial Dist., 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (granting mandamus to vacate appellate court’s order to correct trial court certification, noting that purpose of certification requirement is to efficiently sort appealable cases from non-appealable cases).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.