Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Charles Vaughn v. Badger Rotary Drilling, LLC D/B/A Badger Oilfield Service & Supply

Charles Vaughn v. Badger Rotary Drilling, LLC D/B/A Badger Oilfield Service & Supply
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 13, 2011

Charles Vaughn v. Badger Rotary Drilling, LLC D/B/A Badger Oilfield Service & Supply

Opinion

Opinion filed October 13, 2011

 

                                                                       In The

                                                                             

  Eleventh Court of Appeals

                                                                   __________

 

                                                         No. 11-11-00041-CV

                                                    __________

 

                                      CHARLES VAUGHN, Appellant

 

                                                             V.

 

                BADGER ROTARY DRILLING, LLC D/B/A BADGER

                     OILFIELD SERVICE & SUPPLY, Appellee

 

                                    On Appeal from the 90th District Court

 

                                                          Stephens County, Texas

 

                                                      Trial Court Cause No. 30035

 

 

                                            M E M O R A N D U M    O P I N I O N

            Charles Vaughn is the appellant in this appeal, and Badger Rotary Drilling, LLC d/b/a Badger Oilfield Service & Supply is the appellee in this appeal.  They have filed an “Agreed Order of Dismissal with Prejudice.”  We will treat this filing as a joint motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  In the motion, the parties state that they “have reached a settlement to resolve this appeal and the underlying District Court case, Cause No. 30035, filed in the 90th Judicial District Court, Stephens County, Texas.”  They additionally request this court to render an order dismissing the appeal and assessing costs against the parties incurring them.  Therefore, in accordance with the parties’ request, we dismiss the appeal.

The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

 

 

                                                                                                PER CURIAM

 

October  13, 2011

Panel consists of:  Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Kalenak, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.