Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Ex Parte: Zakee Kaleem Abdullah

Ex Parte: Zakee Kaleem Abdullah
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 7, 2011

Ex Parte: Zakee Kaleem Abdullah

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

                                                ______________________________

 

                                                             No. 06-11-00044-CR

                                                ______________________________

 

 

 

                                       EX PARTE:  ZAKEE KALEEM ABDULLAH

 

 

                                                                                                  

 

                                                                                                                            

                                    On Appeal from the 202nd Judicial District Court

                                                            Bowie County, Texas

                                                   Trial Court No. 11F0009-202

                                                                                                  

 

 

 

 

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                        Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

                                                                             

                                                                             


                                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

            Zakee Kaleem Abdullah has filed two appeals, both from orders by a trial court denying the full relief sought in his application for writ of habeas corpus.  In this case, he was indicted for the criminal offense of holding himself out as a lawyer, although not licensed to practice law.  In the companion case, he was indicted for stealing between $1,500.00 and $20,000.00 from an individual.   Abdullah states that bail was set at $10,000.00 on the present offense, at $50,000.00 on the companion prosecution, and that he was also subject to a parole hold which caused his continued incarceration. 

            In both cases, Abdullah is representing himself.  Abdullah has filed a single brief for both appeals, raising the same issues and seeking relief for the same reasons.

            Because the issues raised in each appeal are identical, for the reasons stated in our opinion dated this day in Abdullah v. State, cause number 06-11-00043-CR, we affirm the order of the trial court.

 

                                                                                    Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                                    Chief Justice

 

Date Submitted:          June 6, 2011   

Date Decided:             June 7, 2011

 

Do Not Publish          

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.