Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

William Albert Schatte v. State

William Albert Schatte v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 26, 2011

William Albert Schatte v. State

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

                                                ______________________________

 

                                                             No. 06-10-00167-CR

                                                ______________________________

 

 

                              WILLIAM ALBERT SCHATTE, Appellant

 

                                                                V.

 

                                     THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

 

                                                                                                  

 

 

                                       On Appeal from the 336th Judicial District Court

                                                             Fannin County, Texas

                                                            Trial Court No. 23007

 

                                                                                                   

 

 

 

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                            Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley


                                                     MEMORANDUM  OPINION

 

            William Albert Schatte appeals from his convictions on his plea of guilty, made before a jury, for aggravated sexual assault in four cases, and for one conviction for indecency with a child.  In a unified brief, he complains that the trial court committed reversible error at the punishment phase that requires remanding the cause for a new hearing on punishment.

            In this case, he was convicted for aggravated sexual assault of a child, and was sentenced to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment and a $10,000.00 fine. 

            Schatte raises a single issue on appeal, in which he contends that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of a prior bad act—anal contact with the victim—although the State had not given him notice of its intent to use the evidence, notwithstanding his request for such notice. 

            Because the issue raised in each appeal is identical, for the reasons stated in our opinion dated this day in Schatte v. State, cause number 06-10-00166-CR, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

 

 

                                                                        Bailey C. Moseley

                                                                        Justice

 

Date Submitted:          May 25, 2011

Date Decided:             May 26, 2011

 

Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.