Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Jarvis Hill v. State

Jarvis Hill v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 17, 2011

Jarvis Hill v. State

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

                                                ______________________________

 

                                                             No. 06-11-00005-CR

                                                ______________________________

 

 

                                             JARVIS HILL, Appellant

 

                                                                V.

 

                                     THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

 

                                                                                                  

 

 

                                       On Appeal from the 115th Judicial District Court

                                                            Upshur County, Texas

                                                            Trial Court No. 15,449

 

                                                                                                   

 

 

 

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                        Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss


                                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

            Appellant, Jarvis Hill, filed a notice of appeal January 6, 2011, from his conviction for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon.  Hill also filed a motion for new trial.  The trial court subsequently granted that motion for new trial, and Hill has therefore filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. 

            When the trial court grants a motion for new trial, it restores the case to its position before the former trial.  Tex. R. App. P. 21.9(b).  Because there is no conviction from which to appeal, we have no jurisdiction to consider Hill’s appeal.  See Waller v. State, 931 S.W.2d 640, 643–44 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1996, no pet.).

            Consequently, Hill’s motion to dismiss is granted, and we dismiss the appeal as moot.

 

 

 

                                                                                    Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                                    Chief Justice

 

Date Submitted:          February 16, 2011      

Date Decided:             February 17, 2011

 

Do Not Publish          

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.