Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

in the Matter of the Jean Wakefield Dean Marital Trust, the Jean Wakefield Dean GSTT Exemption Trust, and the Thurston E. Dean GSTT Exemption Trust

in the Matter of the Jean Wakefield Dean Marital Trust, the Jean Wakefield Dean GSTT Exemption Trust, and the Thurston E. Dean GSTT Exemption Trust
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 3, 2011

in the Matter of the Jean Wakefield Dean Marital Trust, the Jean Wakefield Dean GSTT Exemption Trust, and the Thurston E. Dean GSTT Exemption Trust

Opinion

Opinion filed March 3, 2011

 

                                                                       In The

                                                                             

  Eleventh Court of Appeals

                                                                   __________

 

                                                         No. 11-10-00254-CV

                                                    __________

 

               IN THE MATTER OF THE JEAN WAKEFIELD DEAN

           MARITAL TRUST, THE JEAN WAKEFIELD DEAN GSTT

EXEMPTION TRUST, AND THE THURSTON E. DEAN GSTT EXEMPTION TRUST

 

                                  On Appeal from the 142nd District Court

                                                          Midland County, Texas

                                                 Trial Court Cause No. CV-46,341

 

 

                                            M E M O R A N D U M    O P I N I O N

            David Bradley Dean is the sole appellant in this appeal.  He has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  In the motion, appellant states that “[t]he parties, including Patrick S. Duffy, Guardian ad Litem for all minor, incapacitated, unborn and all unascertained beneficiaries, have now entered into a Settlement Agreement.”  He further states that the terms of the settlement agreement provide for him to dismiss his appeal and allow the final judgment of the trial court to become “a final, non-appealable judgment.”  Therefore, in accordance with appellant’s request, we dismiss the appeal.

The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

 

                                                                                                PER CURIAM

March 3, 2011

Panel consists of:  Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.