Thomas J. Blankenship v. Roy Davis, Frank Kapavik and Brent Ewing
Thomas J. Blankenship v. Roy Davis, Frank Kapavik and Brent Ewing
Opinion
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11-00026-CV
Thomas J. Blankenship,
Appellant
v.
Roy Davis, Frank Kapavik
and Brent Ewing,
Appellees
From the 170th District Court
McLennan County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2009-4246-4
MEMORANDUM Opinion
Appellant has filed a “Motion to Dismiss.” See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
REX D. DAVIS
Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Motion granted; appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed June 8, 2011
[CV06]
was due. We notified him of this defect by letter on December 2. See id. 60(a)(2), 83. He has not responded to our letter showing grounds for continuing the appeal nor has he provided a reasonable explanation for failing to file a brief. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosection. See id. 74(l)(1).
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Thomas,
Justice Cummings, and
Justice Vance
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution
Opinion delivered and filed December 21, 1994
Do not publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.