Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011

James Owen Spurlock v. State

James Owen Spurlock v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided January 6, 2011
James Owen Spurlock v. State

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-10-00214-CR ______________________________ JAMES OWEN SPURLOCK, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 402nd Judicial District Court

Wood County, Texas Trial Court No. 19,452-2006

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

MEMORANDUM OPINION

James Owen Spurlock has filed a pro se notice of appeal, claiming to appeal from the trial court’s denial of his post-conviction motion for DNA testing. We have now received the supplemental clerk’s record containing the order signed by the trial court December 22, 2010. That order denies only Spurlock’s request for appointment of counsel,1 not Spurlock’s motion for post-conviction DNA testing.

An order denying appointed counsel under Article 64.01(c) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure is not appealable. Gutierrez v. State, 307 S.W.3d 318, 319, 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); see TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2); TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 64.01(c) (Vernon Supp. 2010).

We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice

Date Submitted: January 5, 2011 Date Decided: January 6, 2011 Do Not Publish

1 The trial court did not find that reasonable grounds existed for the motion that counsel be appointed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.