Mirta Ramos, Individually, as Spouse of Francisco Velasquez Jr. and as Next...
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00497-CV COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________ MIRTA RAMOS, INDIVIDUALLY, AS SPOUSE OF FRANCISCO VELASQUEZ JR. AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF Z. M. V., A. M. V., E. J. V., A. J. V. AND M. F. V., MINOR CHILDREN OF FRANCISCO VELASQUEZ JR., DECEASED, Appellant, v.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 30, 2011. On November 7, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of the notice, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant.
Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain her failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file her brief, or file her brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 21st day of December, 2011.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.