Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011

in Re Edith Rojas, Dds

in Re Edith Rojas, Dds
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided December 15, 2011
in Re Edith Rojas, Dds

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00728-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE EDITH ROJAS, DDS

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Relator, Edith Rojas, DDS, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which she contends that respondent, the Honorable Tom Greenwell, presiding judge of the 319th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, Texas, abused his discretion by denying relator’s motion to disqualify counsel for real party in interest, Cheryl L. Rhoden, DDS, LLP. On December 9, 2011, we ordered all proceedings in the underlying cause, trial court cause number 2011-DCV-4831-G, stayed until further order of this Court. On December 13, 2011, this Court heard oral argument on the petition for writ of mandamus.

Having reviewed and fully considered relator’s petition, the response filed by real party in interest, relator’s reply to that response, and arguments made by counsel, this Court is of the opinion that relator has not shown herself entitled to the relief requested and that the petition should be denied. Accordingly, the stay previously imposed on the underlying proceedings is LIFTED and relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is hereby DENIED.

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the

15th day of December, 2011.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.