Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Irene Pena v. R. J. Griffin & Company

Irene Pena v. R. J. Griffin & Company
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 30, 2011

Irene Pena v. R. J. Griffin & Company

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-10-00306-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

IRENE PENA,                                                                                   Appellant,

 

                                                             v.

 

 

R. J. GRIFFIN & COMPANY, ET AL.,                                           Appellees.

____________________________________________________________

 

                             On Appeal from the 275th District Court

                                        of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

             Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


This appeal was abated by this Court on June 16, 2010, and the parties were ordered to mediation.  On July 26, 2010, the mediator notified this Court that the parties had settled all issues and the Clerk of the Court notified the parties that they should file a motion to dismiss the appeal.  On December 14, 2010, the parties notified the Court that the settlement was still in process.  On May 16, 2011, this Court sent a letter to the parties inquiring as to the status of the settlement and received no response.  On July 21, 2011, the Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the status of the appeal and, if applicable, a motion to reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal.  The order notified the parties that failure to respond to the order would result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. 

The parties have failed to respond.  Accordingly, we reinstate and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

 

PER CURIAM

 

Delivered and filed the

30th day of August, 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.