Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Harold Boenig v. John P. Jackson and Deborah K. Jackson

Harold Boenig v. John P. Jackson and Deborah K. Jackson
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 18, 2011

Harold Boenig v. John P. Jackson and Deborah K. Jackson

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-11-00348-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

HAROLD BOENIG,                                                                          Appellant,

 

                                                             v.

 

JOHN P. JACKSON AND DEBORAH K. JACKSON,                  Appellees.

____________________________________________________________

 

                              On Appeal from the 24th District Court

                                        of Refugio County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

             Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellant, Harold Boenig, filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the 24th District Court of Refugio County, Texas, in cause number 2008-2-10698.  The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached a settlement agreement.  The parties request that this Court dismiss this appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

18th day of August, 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.