Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Cindy C. Foster v. Fidel Renteria

Cindy C. Foster v. Fidel Renteria
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 17, 2011

Cindy C. Foster v. Fidel Renteria

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § CINDY C. FOSTER, No. 08-10-00180-CV § Appellant, Appeal from the § v. 388th District Court § FIDEL RENTERIA, of El Paso County, Texas § Appellee. (TC# 2009CM5945) § MEMORANDUM OPINION This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be dismissed. Because Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

On July 18, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant’s attorney that Appellant’s brief was past due and that no motion for extension of time had been received. The Clerk also informed counsel that the Court would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days of the notice, she presented grounds for continuing the appeal. To this date, there has been no response to the Clerk’s letter.1 This Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the appellant has failed to file her brief in the time prescribed and gives no reasonable explanation for the failure to do so. TEX . R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex. App. – San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

On July 28, 2011, the Court received from Appellant a copy of an attorney grievance with supporting documentation. The grievance was directed towards her trial counsel, not appellate counsel. The documentation also includes a grievance against the trial judge.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice August 17, 2011 Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.