Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Ramon Donato Garcia v. Priscilla Zavala

Ramon Donato Garcia v. Priscilla Zavala
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 28, 2011

Ramon Donato Garcia v. Priscilla Zavala

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-11-00069-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

RAMON DONATO GARCIA,                                                        Appellant,

 

                                                             v.

 

PRISCILLA ZAVALA,                                                                     Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

 

                           On appeal from the 444th District Court

                                      of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

             Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellant, Ramon Donato Garcia, filed an appeal from a judgment rendered against him in favor of appellee, Priscilla Zavala.  On May 25, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on March 15, 2011, and that the deputy district clerk, Freddy Cardoza, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record.  The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3, 42.3(b), (c).   Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

On May 5, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that he was delinquent in remitting a $175.00 filing fee.  The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter.  See id. 42.3(b), (c).

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notices and has failed to pay the filing fee.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

28th day of July, 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.