Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Alejandro Lopez and Linda Lopez v. Alice Enterprises, Inc.

Alejandro Lopez and Linda Lopez v. Alice Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 14, 2011

Alejandro Lopez and Linda Lopez v. Alice Enterprises, Inc.

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-11-00224-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

ALEJANDRO LOPEZ AND LINDA LOPEZ,                      APPELLANTS,

 

                                                             v.

 

ALICE ENTERPRISES, INC.,                                                  APPELLEES.

____________________________________________________________

 

                              On appeal from the 79th District Court

                                      of Jim Wells County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

             Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellants, Alejandro Lopez and Linda Lopez, appealed a judgment entered by the 79th District Court of Jim Wells County, Texas.  On May 16, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $175.00 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellants have not responded to the notice from the Clerk or paid the $175.00 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).  Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and for failure of appellants to comply with requirement of rules.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ failure to pay the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed.  See id. 42.3(b),(c).  Accordingly, appellee’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.                                                                        

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

14th day of July, 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.