Kristal Napper v. Dominique Jenkins
Kristal Napper v. Dominique Jenkins
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
KRISTAL NAPPER,Appellant, v. DOMINIQUE JENKINS,Appellee. | § | Appeal from the 383rd District Court of El Paso County, Texas (TC# 2011CM676) |
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The clerk's record for this appeal was due on April 10, 2011. The district clerk notified this Court that the record would not be filed because Appellant did not make financial arrangements for its preparation. On April 12, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the Court intended to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless she could show grounds for continuing it within ten days. The notice indicated that if no response was received, the appeal could be dismissed without further notice. Appellant has not responded.
When the clerk's record is not filed because the appellant failed to pay for it, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant cures the deficiency or shows that she is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has been notified of the deficiency, but has neither cured it nor shown her entitlement to proceed without payment of costs. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice
May 27, 2011
Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.