Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Southwestern Bell Telephone, L. P. and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. Rachel Alexander

Southwestern Bell Telephone, L. P. and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. Rachel Alexander
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 25, 2011

Southwestern Bell Telephone, L. P. and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. Rachel Alexander

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS



SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, L.P. and SOUTHWESTERN BELL COMPANY,


                            Appellants,


v.



RACHEL ALEXANDER,


                            Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 §


No. 08-10-00049-CV


Appeal from the


205th Judicial District Court


of El Paso County, Texas


(TC# 2008-901)


MEMORANDUM OPINION


            Pending before the Court is a joint motion to vacate the trial court’s judgment in this case and dismiss the appeal as the parties have resolved their disputes. The motion states that the parties have reached an agreement settling all issues and claims between them. They request an order: (1) vacating the judgment entered in the court below; (2) releasing the surety from any further obligation regarding the supersedeas bond; and (3) dismissing the appeal.

                        Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a) permits the appellate court to dispose of an appeal in accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a). Having considered this motion, and as it otherwise complies with the requirements of Rule 42.1(a)(2), we conclude the motion should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. In accordance with our authority pursuant to Rule 43.2(e), we will vacate the trial court’s judgment. See Tex.R.App.P. 43.2(e). Having taken such affirmative actions, we must deny the parties’ request to dismiss the appeal. In addition, as specifically requested by the parties in furtherance of their settlement, the corporate surety shall be released from any further obligation or liability related to the supersedeas bond filed in this case. As the motion indicates, the parties have so agree, each shall bear their own appellate costs. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(d). This Court’s mandate shall issue without delay.



May 25, 2011

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice


Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.