Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

in Re Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, Lp D/B/A Tractor Supply Company 1104, Tractor Supply Company, and Victor Fonseca

in Re Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, Lp D/B/A Tractor Supply Company 1104, Tractor Supply Company, and Victor Fonseca
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 4, 2011

in Re Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, Lp D/B/A Tractor Supply Company 1104, Tractor Supply Company, and Victor Fonseca

Opinion

                  

 

 

 

 

NUMBER 13-11-00157-CV

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

 


IN RE TRACTOR SUPPLY CO. OF TEXAS, LP D/B/A

TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY #1104,

TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY, AND VICTOR FONSECA

 

 


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

 

 


MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Justices Garza, Vela, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam[1]

Relators, Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, LP d/b/a Tractor Supply Company #1104, Tractor Supply Company, and Victor Fonseca, filed a petition for writ of mandamus on March 22, 2011.  The parties to this original proceeding have now filed an “Agreed Motion to Dismiss in Aid of Settlement.”  According to this motion, the parties have fully and finally compromised and settled all matters of fact and things in controversy between them.  Accordingly, the parties request that we dismiss this original proceeding with prejudice. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the agreed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to dismiss and DISMISS this original proceeding with prejudice.

It is so ORDERED.

 

                                                                                            

                                                                                    PER CURIAM

 

 

Delivered and filed

the 4th day of May, 2011.

 

                                                           



[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.