Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Ken Fleming and Paul Barrett, Directors of Family Live Revival Center, Inc. v. Charles Edward Barber, Director of Family Life Revival Center, Inc.

Ken Fleming and Paul Barrett, Directors of Family Live Revival Center, Inc. v. Charles Edward Barber, Director of Family Life Revival Center, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 14, 2011

Ken Fleming and Paul Barrett, Directors of Family Live Revival Center, Inc. v. Charles Edward Barber, Director of Family Life Revival Center, Inc.

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-10-00411-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

KEN FLEMING AND PAUL BARRETT,

DIRECTORS OF FAMILY LIFE REVIVAL

CENTER, INC.,                                                                      APPELLANTS,

 

                                                             v.

 

CHARLES EDWARD BARBER,

DIRECTOR OF FAMILY LIFE REVIVAL

CENTER, INC.,                                                                             APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

 

                            On appeal from the 13th District Court

                                       of Navarro County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

                                Before Justices Vela, Perkes, and Hill[1]

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellants, Ken Fleming and Paul Barrett, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 13th District Court of Navarro County, Texas, in cause number 07-16291-CV.  The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss on grounds that all matters in controversy between them in this cause have been fully compromised and settled.  The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal. 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

 

 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the  

14th day of April, 2011.     



                        [1]  Retired Second Court of Appeals Justice John G. Hill assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to the government code. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 74.003 (Vernon 2005).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.