Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

in Re: Marcus Kyle Free

in Re: Marcus Kyle Free
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 11, 2011

in Re: Marcus Kyle Free

Opinion

                  

 

 

 

 

NUMBER 13-11-0000166-CV

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

 


IN RE MARCUS KYLE FREE

 

 


On Application for Writ of Prohibition or Injunction

Or for Expedited Ruling on Appellant’s Motion to Suspend.

 

 


MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Justices Garza, Vela, and Perkes

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]

Relator, Marcus Kyle Free, filed an “Application for Writ of Prohibition or Injunction or for Expedited Ruling on Appellant’s Motion to Suspend”[2] in the above cause on March 28, 2011.  The Court requested and received a response to the application from the real party in interest herein, Cathy Diane Lewis.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the “Application for Writ of Prohibition or Injunction or for Expedited Ruling on Appellant’s Motion to Suspend” and the response thereto, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought.  Accordingly, the application for writ of prohibition or injunction or for expedited ruling is DENIED.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a), (d).

 

                                                                                                            PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

11th day of April, 2011.

                                               

                                                                                               

 



[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

 

[2] In an appeal pending before this Court in appellate cause number 13-11-00113-CV, relator had previously filed a “Motion to Suspend Enforcement of the Injunctive Relief Portions of the Final Judgment.”  The Court’s ruling on that motion will be rendered by separate order issued in that cause. 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.