Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Margarita Vargas De La Rosa v. Francisco De La Rosa, Jr.

Margarita Vargas De La Rosa v. Francisco De La Rosa, Jr.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 24, 2011

Margarita Vargas De La Rosa v. Francisco De La Rosa, Jr.

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-09-00432-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

MARGARITA VARGAS DE LA ROSA,                                      Appellant,

 

                                                             v.

 

FRANCISCO DE LA ROSA, JR.,                                                   Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

 

                          On appeal from the 332nd District Court

                                       of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

         Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

                                                                 


The appellant's brief in the above cause was originally due on January 6, 2010.  Appellant has previously requested and received nine prior extensions of time to file the brief.  On December 21, 2010, this Court ordered the appellate brief to be filed on or before January 10, 2011.  The order notified counsel that no further extensions would be granted and that if the brief was not filed, the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. 

Instead of filing the brief, counsel filed a ninth motion for extension of time to file the brief.  The Court granted the motion and ordered the brief to be filed no later than February 22, 2011.  The order notified counsel that if he failed to file the brief, he would be ordered to show good cause.  To date no response has been received from appellant and the brief has not been filed. 

Appellant has failed to file her brief.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b)(c).

 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

24th day of March, 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.