in Re Calvin Hyder
in Re Calvin Hyder
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00156-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE CALVIN HYDER
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Garza, Vela and Perkes
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam[1]
Relator, Calvin Hyder, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging that the Honorable Michael Welborn, presiding judge of the 156th Judicial District Court of Bee County, Texas, abused his discretion by declining to vacate relator’s conviction of harrassment. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 42.07 (Vernon 2003).
Having reviewed and fully considered relator’s petition, this Court is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief requested and that the petition should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.[2]
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the
23rd day of March, 2011.
[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions), 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”).
[2] Hyder has also filed with this Court a “Motion for Production and Inspection of Documents,” apparently asking that we compel the production of certain documents produced as part of the trial court proceedings, including the indictment. The motion is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.