Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Premium Star, Inc. v. U.S. Grain & Feed Ingredients, Inc. and American Rice, Inc.

Premium Star, Inc. v. U.S. Grain & Feed Ingredients, Inc. and American Rice, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 17, 2011

Premium Star, Inc. v. U.S. Grain & Feed Ingredients, Inc. and American Rice, Inc.

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-11-00040-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

PREMIUM STAR, INC.,                                                           APPELLANT,

 

                                                             v.

 

U. S. GRAIN & FEED INGREDIENTS, INC.

AND AMERICAN RICE, INC.,                                                  APPELLEES.

____________________________________________________________

 

                    On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

                                  of Montgomery County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

                            Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellant, Premium Star, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment rendered against it in favor of appellees, U.S. Grain & Feed Ingredients, Inc. and American Rice, Inc.  On January 31, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on January 5, 2011, and that the deputy district clerk, Bobbye Miller, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record.  The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c).   Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. 

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notice.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).       

 

PER CURIAM

 

Delivered and filed the  

17th day of March, 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.