Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011

Mary Feild Jarvis v. Frank Ewing Feild and John Shaw Feild

Mary Feild Jarvis v. Frank Ewing Feild and John Shaw Feild
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided March 10, 2011 · No. 13-10-00129-CV
Mary Feild Jarvis v. Frank Ewing Feild and John Shaw Feild

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00081-CV COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE MONICA MICHELENA On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1 Relator, Monica Michelena, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on February 15, 2011, seeking to compel the trial court to transfer venue of a suit affecting the parent-child relationship from Hidalgo County, Texas, to Cameron County, Texas. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 155.204 (Vernon 2008). By order issued on February 17, 2011, the Court requested that the real party in interest, Robert Michelena, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus, and such response was duly filed on February 28, 2011.

Currently pending before the Court is relator’s motion to supplement the record. The Court hereby grants the motion to supplement the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(2), (b).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response thereto, is of the opinion that relator has not shown herself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See id. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 10th day of March, 2011.

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.