Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Bishop Consolidated Independent School District v. Cynthia Nava, Individually and as Next Friend of Demi Nava, a Minor

Bishop Consolidated Independent School District v. Cynthia Nava, Individually and as Next Friend of Demi Nava, a Minor
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 10, 2011

Bishop Consolidated Independent School District v. Cynthia Nava, Individually and as Next Friend of Demi Nava, a Minor

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-10-00587-CV

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

                      THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

 

BISHOP CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT

SCHOOL DISTRICT,                                                                       Appellant,

 

                                                             v.

 

CYNTHIA NAVA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

NEXT FRIEND OF DEMI NAVA, A MINOR,                                   Appellee.

 

 

                              On Appeal from the 17th District Court

                                        of Nueces County, Texas.

 

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

            Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


This appeal was abated by this Court on November 18, 2010, to allow the parties the opportunity to engage in mediation.  This cause is now before the Court on appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that all matters in controversy between the parties have been resolved to the mutual satisfaction of all parties.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.  Accordingly, this case is hereby REINSTATED.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

 

PER CURIAM

 

Delivered and filed the

10th day of February, 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.