Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Rodriguez & Jones v. Dario Bargas, Jr.

Rodriguez & Jones v. Dario Bargas, Jr.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 3, 2011

Rodriguez & Jones v. Dario Bargas, Jr.

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-10-00312-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

 

RODRIGUEZ & JONES,                                                                Appellant,

 

                                                             v.

 

DARIO BARGAS, JR.,                                                                    Appellee.

 

 

                     On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

                                       of Nueces County, Texas.

 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

                 Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides

                               Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

            Appellant, Rodriguez & Jones (a partnership formerly known as Bargas, Rodriguez, & Jones), perfected an appeal from a judgment entered in County Court at Law No. 3 in Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 08-60151-3.  On November 19, 2010, this Court issued an Order Abating Appeal and referred the case to mediation.

 

 

 

The appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss on grounds that all matters in controversy between the parties in this cause have been fully compromised and settled.  The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Accordingly, the case is REINSTATED, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

 

                                                                                                            PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

3rd day of February, 2011.           

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.