Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Keith Ray Miller v. State

Keith Ray Miller v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 19, 2011

Keith Ray Miller v. State

Opinion

                                                            NO. 07-10-0511-CR

                                                                             

                                                   IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

 

                                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                                                                 AT AMARILLO

 

                                                                      PANEL B

 

                                                            JANUARY 19, 2011

                                            ______________________________

 

                                                           KEITH RAY MILLER,

 

Appellant

 

                                                                            V.

 

                                                        THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

Appellee

                                         _________________________________

 

                       FROM THE 100th DISTRICT COURT OF CARSON COUNTY;

 

                                  NO. 3979; HON. STUART MESSER, PRESIDING

                                           _______________________________

 

                                                       Abatement and Remand

                                           _______________________________

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Appellant Keith Ray Miller appeals his conviction for possession of marijuana.  The clerk=s record was filed on December 20, 2010.  The reporter=s record was due on December 13, 2010.  On January 18, 2011, the court reporter filed a request for extension of time to file the reporter’s record, stating that she has not received a notice of appeal or a written designation for the record from appellant’s counsel.  In addition, the trial judge received a letter from appellant’s counsel stating that appellant does not wish to appeal.

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 100th District Court of Carson County (trial court) to determine the following issues:

1.  whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

         2.  whether appellant is indigent;

                       3.  whether the appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to his indigency;

 

                        4.  when the reporter’s record can reasonably be filed (given the length of trial and size of the record) in a manner that does not unduly delay the prosecution if this appeal.

 

 

The trial court shall 1) issue such orders it deems necessary to address those issues, 2) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, and 3) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk=s record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter.  Additionally, the district court shall then cause the supplemental record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before February 17, 2011. Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before February 17, 2011.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

 

Do not publish.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.