Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011

Keith Luker v. Bank of America, NA as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank, NA,...

Keith Luker v. Bank of America, NA as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank, NA,...
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided October 13, 2011
Keith Luker v. Bank of America, NA as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank, NA,...

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00318-CV

KEITH LUKER APPELLANT

V.

BANK OF AMERICA, NA AS APPELLEE SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK, NA, TRUSTEE FOR CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACK SECURITIES I LLC, ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2007-FSI

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On August 23, 2011, and September 12, 2011, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not paid the $175 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2007, 2 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 13, 2011

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in courts of appeals).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.