Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2011

Rory Newkirk v. Donnaley, Inc., L.L.C. D/B/A BellaDonna Shoes, Tiffanie O'Bryant, and Libbie Roundtree

Rory Newkirk v. Donnaley, Inc., L.L.C. D/B/A BellaDonna Shoes, Tiffanie O'Bryant, and Libbie Roundtree
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 26, 2011

Rory Newkirk v. Donnaley, Inc., L.L.C. D/B/A BellaDonna Shoes, Tiffanie O'Bryant, and Libbie Roundtree

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-10-00411-CV

RORY NEWKIRK APPELLANT V. DONNALEY, INC., L.L.C. D/B/A APPELLEES BELLADONNA SHOES, TIFFANIE O'BRYANT, AND LIBBIE ROUNDTREE

------------ FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------ On April 27, 2011, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: May 26, 2011

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.