the Brinkmann Corporation, Don S. Clayton, Steven W. Neuwoehner, Christina...
the Brinkmann Corporation, Don S. Clayton, Steven W. Neuwoehner, Christina...
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-10-00437-CV
THE BRINKMANN CORPORATION, APPELLANTS DON S. CLAYTON, STEVEN W.
NEUWOEHNER, CHRISTINA EDWARDS, KELLY RIPLEY, AND DEBBIE COPELAND V. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, APPELLEE LLC D/B/A INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORP.
------------ FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------ We have considered appellant The Brinkmann Corporation’s “Unopposed Motion For Reinstatement.” The motion is GRANTED. The appeal is ordered
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. reinstated and the portions of the reporter’s record specified in the trial court’s “Order Partially Sealing Trial Record” signed April 5, 2011, are sealed.
We have also considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion To Dismiss Interlocutory Accelerated Appeal.” It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: April 14, 2011
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.